Tag Archives: Eisenhower

H.W. Brands. The Strange Death of American Liberalism.

H.W. Brands. The Strange Death of American Liberalism.

For me a five-star book is something that either I want to read again or something that is so profound it makes an immediate impact. There are lots of ways that books can be compelling: a unique idea, an interesting set of characters, a complex plot, an artistic use of the English language and more. Reading is also a subjective experience, so what appeals to me as a reader may be very different for you. I read a lot for both pleasure and work, but these short reviews are a way for me to show my appreciation for the work and the craft of the author of the reviewed work.

H.W. Brands is a prolific writer and historian who teaches at the University of Texas at Austin. I first encountered his work while I was on sabbatical and became fascinated with the story of the American West and his Dreams of Eldorado: a History of the American West was an insightful introduction to many of the people and places of the history of the west. I picked up this book because the title intrigued me, but I did not expect this twenty-five-year-old book to be so insightful for our present moment in the life of America. Brands argues that going back to the founding of the United States most American were skeptical of a centralized government and Jeffersonian populism enjoyed more support than Hamilton’s view of a strong centralized national government. Liberalism in Brand’s argument is the belief that government can do many things to benefit the population which includes not only programs like Social Security or Medicare but also large infrastructure projects like the Interstate Highway System. He argues that the United States is a nation skeptical of strong government except when they need the government to protect them from enemies. During wartime Americans have accepted the necessity of the government consolidating authority that they would not accept in any other situation. In the aftermath of World War II the United States entered the Cold War which allowed the government to continue to operate with expanded powers with broad support from the people and leaders in both political parties. Brands places the death of American liberalism in the Nixon administration as the distrust in the government engendered during the Vietnam War and the disclosures of the manipulations and deceptions during the Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon administrations are revealed. This skepticism found it’s popular voicing in Reagan’s famous statement about the nine most terrifying words in the English language, “I’m from the government, and I’m here to help.” Yet, even Reagan utilized the threat of the Soviet Union to expand the foreign policy and defense spending of the United States.

H.W. Brands’s framing of American liberalism as the belief that the national government can and should do many things on behalf of the American people rather than state and local governments is helpful even if many will find it controversial. The book was published in November 2001, shortly after September 11 created another crisis which allowed the Bush and later administrations to expand the power of the government and gave birth to a short rebirth to a liberalism that could underwrite both a neo-conservative increase of government’s role in the policing of American life as well as the government’s expanded role in the healthcare system during the Obama administration.  But it also explains the rise of the tea party movement in the Republican party and the eventual rise of Trump populism. It also helps to explain the isolationism that is rising among portions of the American populace that want a pull-back from American commitments to the post World War II order. Brands’s argument is provocative, and many people disagree with his conclusions, but it was insightful for me to understand why many citizens may not see the same value in the federal government’s role on behalf of its people that I do.

Review of D-Day: June 6, 1944 by Stephen Ambrose

Review of D-Day:June 6, 1944: The Climactic Battle of World War II by Stephen Ambrose (1994)

For me a five-star book is something that either I want to read again or something that is so profound it makes an immediate impact. There are lots of ways that books can be compelling: a unique idea, an interesting set of characters, a complex plot, an artistic use of the English language and more. Reading is also a subjective experience, so what appeals to me as a reader may be very different for you. I read a lot for both pleasure and work, but these short reviews are a way for me to show my appreciation for the work and the craft of the author of the reviewed work.

Stephen Ambrose’s phenomenal telling of D-Day accomplishes the daunting task of bringing together the first-person experiences of both allied and axis soldiers, placing the experiences together with the units and locations within the overall plan and execution of the D-Day invasion of Normandy. This is like a mosaic where the author takes a variety of perspectives on the invasion and places them together into a coherent picture which still conveys the chaos the soldiers often felt on the beaches. The first third of the book examines the preparations for the invasion. Stephen Ambrose is able to narrate the personalities and styles of both Eisenhower and Rommel who were the respective commanders on D-Day as well as the command structures they operated within. The D-Day invasion was involved a mammoth effort of logistics and construction to mount and the author walks the reader through the construction of the landing craft, the planning of the invasion and the disinformation campaigns designed to keep German forces away from the landing site, and the training of the soldiers, sailors, and coast guardsmen who would conduct the landing and axis construction and forces designated to repel the invasion. The preparation was critical, and it both made the invasion possible and saved lives, but the book demonstrates all the ways that the plans for the invasion could not account for the reality the soldiers on the beach or who were dropped behind the beach encountered. Moving from west to east he narrates the individual experiences of the battle beginning with the experiences of the 82nd and 101st Airborne Divisions in their night drop and ending with the British 6th Airborne Division on the eastern edge of the battlefield. Particularly with the airborne landings and the 16th and 116th Regiments landing on Omaha beach, the author does an excellent job of portraying the chaotic environment that soldiers found themselves in. The battle in these spaces often relied on junior officers and non-commissioned officers rallying any soldiers they could gather and the training these soldiers received. The book does a good job of combining the epic scale of the invasion with the narrow experiences of the individuals who were a part of this. It was readable and comprehensive at the same time, and I greatly appreciate the dedication and devotion that went into this massive narration of one of the critical days of World War II.